Evidence codes
At the time of building associations to the plant ontology, evidence codes areused to suggest the type of experiment cited by the researcher thus confirming the protein/transcript epression, mutant or QTL associated phenotype, etc.
The codes are listed along with examples (not exhaustivelists) of the kinds of experiments that would fall into each category.For every evidence category, there is a flexibility for the curators toexercise judgement about the quality of the evidence, and how well it supportsannotation to a node within each ontology. The distinction between "TAS"and "NAS" is particularly sensitive to interpretation. We will appreciateyour feedback, if you think that we should include other types of methodologiesunder the sub-categories and expand the framework of evaluation. Pleasefeel free to communicate your suggestions at po-dev@plantontology.org.
IC inferred by curator
- To be used for those cases where an annotation is not supported by any evidence, but can be reasonably inferred by a curator from other POC annotations, for which evidence is available
IDA inferred from direct assay
- Enzyme assays
- In vitro reconstitution (e.g. transcription)
- Immunofluorescence (for specific localization either / both in a tissue type or in a cellular component)
- Cell fractionation (for cellular component)
- Physical interaction / binding assay (sometimes appropriatefor cellular component)
IEA inferred from electronicannotation
- Annotations based on "hits" in sequence similarity searchs,if they have not been reviewed by curators (curator-reviewed hits wouldget ISS)
- Annotations transferred from database records, if not reviewedby curators (curator-reviewed items may use NAS, or the reviewing processmay lead to print references for the annotation)
IEP inferred from expression pattern
- Transcript levels (e.g. northerns, microarray data)
- Protein levels (e.g. western blots)
IMP inferred from mutant phenotype
- Any gene mutation / knockout (or deletion) / disruption
- Over expression / ectopic expression of wild-type or mutantgenes
- Anti-sense experiments
- RNAi experiments
- Specific protein inhibitors
IGI inferred from genetic interaction
- Traditional genetic interactions such as suppressors, syntheticlethals, etc.
- Functional and/or genetic complementation
- Rescue experiments
- Inference about one gene drawn from the phenotype of a mutationin a different gene
- Also where a mutation in one gene (gene A) provides informationabout the function, process, or component of another gene (gene B; i.e.annotate gene B using IGI).
IPI inferred from physical interaction
- 2-hybrid interactions or 3-hybrid interactions
- Co-purification
- Co-immunoprecipitation, RIA, ELISA
- Cross-linking / Ligand / Ion / protein binding experiments(affinity interaction experiments)
ISS inferred from sequence or structuralsimilarity
- Sequence similarity (homologue of / most closely related to)
- Recognized domains
- Structural similarity
- Southern blotting (Should not include the mapping studiesfrom IAGP)
IAGP inferredby association of genotype from phenotype
- Polymorphism or segregation of genetic markers eg. isozymes,RFLPs (Random Fragment Length Polymorphism), RAPDs (Random amplified polymorphicDNA), AFLPs (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism), SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms), Microsatellite markers or SSR (Simple Sequence Repeats), TD (Transposon Display).
- Polymorphism or segregation of physical markers eg. FISH,centromeric, heterochromatic regions, chromosomal banding patterns.
- Detection of polymorphisms in segregating plant material derived from Bi-parental crosses eg. F2 lines, F3 families, Back cross populations, viz., BC1, BC2 etc.; Doubled Haploid lines (DH), Recombinant Inbred Lines (RIL).
- Detection of polymorphisms in genetic stocks, e.g., Near Isogenic Lines (NIL), Introgression Lines (IL), Radiation Hybrids (RH), Cytogenetic Stocks (CG), i.e., trisomics, aneuploids, etc.
NAS non-traceable author statement
- Database entries that don't cite a peer reviewed paper orarticle (e.g. Plant gene register, SwissProt records, YPD protein reports)
- Statements in papers (abstract, introduction, or discussion)that a curator cannot trace to another publication
TAS traceable author statement
- Anything in a review article where the original experimentsare traceable through that article (material from introductions to non-reviewpapers will sometimes meet this standard)
- Anything found in a text book or dictionary; usually textbook material has become common knowledge.
![[Home Page]](/images/poc_logo.gif){kind=logo}
